← Search

Eleanor Redding

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 76W–100L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history176 matches
L
2026-10-05 · Redding/White 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ingrid Avera
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-22 · White/Redding 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gwen Highsmith-Quick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · Redding/White 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gladys Dunn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · White/Redding 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Chinnis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · White/Redding 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Michaud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-24 · Redding/White 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Chinnis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-06 · Redding/White 55s 3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gladys Dunn
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Redding/White 55s 3.0W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Myra Propst
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-23 · Redding/White 55s 3.0W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terri Laughlin
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-22 · Redding/White 55s 3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Wood
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-22 · Redding/White 65s 3.0W Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hilliard
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · Redding/White 65s 3.0W Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Wrenn
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
52.8%
38W–34L · 52.1% of games
3.5
29.2%
7W–17L · 45.5% of games
6.5
47.4%
27W–30L · 49.6% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.8% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0%
0W–7L · 21.5% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
54 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert