Search

Maxim Shmotolokha

Bellingham, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
79 matches · 34W–45L · seasons 20212026
Where Maxim sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Maxim is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maxim has been 5.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Maxim has gone from the 58th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 42.8% of games
5.0
45%
18W–22L · 51.2% of games
10.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.7% of games
9.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
L
Rob Condiotty / Ken Bang
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kelvin Yuchen
+0.064better than expected — took 55% of games against 30% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
Hans PODLIPNIK Castillo / Dzianis Zharyn
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Stefan Frljanic
0.017below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bence Dare
+0.039better than expected — took 56% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Alex Braksator
0.139about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kawika Lam / Mitch Stewart
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Alex Braksator
0.015below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Cannon Sullivan / Kojiro Narita
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Emahd Khan
+0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Jake Faundez / Grant Riechmann
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cooper Anderson
0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Emahd Khan
0.205about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Brian Nguyen
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 5.0
0.036below expectation — took 57% of games against 66% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Rajul Chikkalingaiah / Zachary Fleischman
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Oscar Cruz
+0.007about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Yevgeniy Kolomiyets
+0.036better than expected — took 61% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Shubhu Purohit / Akash Prasad
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kelvin Yuchen
0.021below expectation — took 42% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.