← Search

Rob Condiotty

Newcastle, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
76 matches · 50W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Rob sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Rob is one of 77 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rob has been 5.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.0201920212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Rob has gone from the 71st to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
0.0
50%
5W–5L · 50% of games
5.0
72.9%
35W–13L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jesse Walter
−0.189about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ken Bang
−0.061below expectation — took 45% of games against 69% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
Jonathan Powell / Wataru Ueno
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ken Bang
−0.012about as expected — took 62% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Joseph Dela Cruz / Adam Amsel
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Damien David
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Frederick Walsh
−0.059below expectation — took 45% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ken Bang
−0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · #1 Singles · 5.0
−0.056below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Andy Loveless / Winston McClanahan
2026-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jesse Walter
−0.024about as expected — took 71% of games against 72% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ken Bang
+0.020better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jeffrey Richards
+0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Kyle Schraeder / Nick Moxleychamps
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Jackson Cobb
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Ryan Paul / Sean McPheechamps
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Julian Seneviratne
−0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.