← Search

Frederick Walsh

Bellevue, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 74W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Frederick Walsh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Ken Bang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrew Elling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jackson Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kristofer Goddard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ken Bang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Rob Condiotty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Julian Seneviratne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · WSC-The 9.0 Terrors-Shen · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara Simonson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-01 · WSC-The 9.0 Terrors-Shen · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara Simonson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-10-12 · WSC-The 9.0 Terrors-Shen · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Megan Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Jackson Cobb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Kristofer Goddard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.2% of games
5.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 58.4% of games
10.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.8% of games
5.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
43%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal