← Search

Frederick Walsh

Bellevue, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
100 matches · 73W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Frederick sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Frederick is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Frederick has been 5.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Frederick has gone from the 21st to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.2% of games
5.0
74.4%
32W–11L · 58.2% of games
10.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.8% of games
9.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
W
Rajul Chikkalingaiah / Riley Peschon
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrew Elling
−0.014about as expected — took 63% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jackson Cobb
−0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Shane Lynette / Shrey Arora
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kristofer Goddard
+0.033better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Vincent Lin / Charles Hodge
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ken Bang
−0.051below expectation — took 67% of games against 79% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Rob Condiotty
−0.060below expectation — took 45% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Ryan Hoy / Andy Loveless
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Julian Seneviratne
+0.031better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara Simonson
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Chiaki Yoshikawa / Vincent Viloriamixed
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara Simonson
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Megan Miller
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Kevin Hsieh / Dennis Nguyenchamps
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Jackson Cobb
−0.019below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Jared Zaugg / Callan Petersonchamps
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Kristofer Goddard
+0.007about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Brenden Barrows / Gordon Barrowschamps
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Kyle Everly
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.