Search

David Ichikawa

Seattle, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
48 matches · 22W–26L · seasons 20192026
Where David sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

David is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been 5.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, David has gone from the 9th to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
5.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 45.4% of games
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Richard Deitz
0.025below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Rob Condiotty / Ken Bang
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with James Wonneberg
+0.010about as expected — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Tuan Nguyen / Luke Barry
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Cory Moderhak
0.079below expectation — took 44% of games against 75% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Ryan Pang / Scott Hulse
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Baraka Brown
+0.039better than expected — took 48% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Richard Deitz
0.017below expectation — took 39% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Shore
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 73% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Duyen Truong
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Duyen Truong
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Duyen Truong
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Frederick Walsh / Zackary Ahyat
2025-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Adam Amsel
0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Frank Pavia
0.048below expectation — took 45% of games against 63% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ben Falk
+0.005about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.