← Search

Daniel Desio

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Prospect Heights, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 39W–23L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history62 matches
W
2026-01-10 · CDTA W 18&OM4.5 7.CPE Sitar Sat 4 $28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Franzen
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · CDTA E 18&OM4.5 7Glvw Sternfield Sun 5 $24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nick Charlton-Perrin
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · CDTA E 18&OM4.5 7Glvw Sternfield Sun 5 $24 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-06-19 · CDTA S A18M4.5 7Glenbrook Sternfield Sat 4 $25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luiz Pedrosa
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-11-03 · CDTA F ComboM8.5 1.Glenbrook Li Sun 11 $25 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luiz Pedrosa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-10-20 · CDTA F ComboM8.5 1.Glenbrook Li Sun 11 $25 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Kamenjarin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-10-13 · CDTA F ComboM8.5 1.Glenbrook Li Sun 11 $25 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thomas Mezzano
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-10-06 · CDTA F ComboM8.5 1.Glenbrook Li Sun 11 $25 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thomas Mezzano
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-09-15 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michele Ihlanfeldt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Felicelli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-08-04 · CDTA S M18&OX9.0 5.Glenbrook Stenmark Sun 7 $25 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Claire Buehler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-07-28 · CDTA S M18&OX9.0 5.Glenbrook Stenmark Sun 7 $25 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anna Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.9% of games
8.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.9% of games
8.5mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer