← Search

Marek Sypolka

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Prospect, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 89W–31L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history120 matches
W
2026-10-24 · CHI E 40M4.0 5.RT Ciuca Sat 4 $29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Spurgeon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-17 · CHI E 18M4.0 8.RT Rus Sun 4 $29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Nica
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-03 · CHI E 40M4.0 5.RT Ciuca Sat 4 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Franzen
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-09-27 · CHI E 18M4.0 8.RT Rus Sun 4 $29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rafael Lozada
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-26 · CHI E 40M4.0 5.RT Ciuca Sat 4 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hideaki Takahashi
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · CDTA W 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Sun 4 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Igor Gogov
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Default
2026-04-16 · CDTA W 40&OM4.0 1.RT Ciuca Sat 4 $27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-11 · CDTA W 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Sun 4 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyrin Wages
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · CDTA W 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Sun 4 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Wangman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
Aidan Burkley / Duc Duong
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Nica championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Nica championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Wangman championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.6% of games
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.3% of games
3.5
80%
32W–8L · 61% of games
4.0
83.3%
25W–5L · 62.3% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 60.6% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.6% of games
8.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert