← Search

Igor Gogov

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
325 matches · 215W–110L · seasons 2016–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2027 and 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history325 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CHI E M18.9.0 3.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $29 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marianne Sharping mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · CHI E 18M4.0 8.RT Rus Sun 4 $29 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · NITA F 75CMa River Trails-Ciuca/Hong · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Nica
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-11 · CHI E 18M4.0 8.RT Rus Sun 4 $29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rafael Lozada
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · CHI E 18M4.0 8.RT Rus Sun 4 $29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hazem Isawi
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · NITA F 75CMa River Trails-Ciuca/Hong · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ketong Xie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · NITA S 85CMb River Trails-Ciuca · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Oscar Moncau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-13 · NITA S 85CMb River Trails-Ciuca · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Oscar Moncau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · CDTA S TriMHi 1.RT Ciuca Sat 2 $27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adrian Ciuca
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
79.2%
38W–10L · 64.4% of games
4.0
67.7%
65W–31L · 55.4% of games
7.5
50%
5W–5L · 50.5% of games
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
89.2%
33W–4L · 64.8% of games
7.5mixed
60%
15W–10L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
65.7%
23W–12L · 55.2% of games
8.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 55.7% of games
9.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
49 matches
Singles
13%
42 matches
#2 Singles
13%
41 matches
#1 Singles
11%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King