← Search

Steve Breit

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clarksdale, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 43W–26L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history69 matches
W
2026-03-26 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Johns
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-19 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Eir
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-29 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sorin Alexanian
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-03-20 · CV LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Bauersfeld
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-02-27 · CV LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Eir
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-02-19 · CV LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfield · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Balch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-01-30 · CV LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfield · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Eir
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-01-16 · CV LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Eir
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-10 · CV LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-02-29 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/B Smith & J Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-02-21 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/B Smith & J Bauersfield · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Eir
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-02-15 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/B Smith & J Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Bauersfeld
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 45% of games
7.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 66.5% of games
8.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 62.7% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal