← Search

Nathalie Rademacher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 110W–86L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history196 matches
L
2026-10-05 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Frederick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-28 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Frederick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Frederick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-31 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kitzia Bordlee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kitzia Bordlee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-03 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kitzia Bordlee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Frederick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-10 · Lovell/40/4.0/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celene Miller
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-4
W
2026-03-05 · LeGrange/18/4.0/WN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celene Miller
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-02-26 · LeGrange/18/4.0/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Armentor
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-24 · Lovell/40/4.0/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celene Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-19 · LeGrange/18/4.0/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lyndal Leggett
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63%
58W–34L · 55.1% of games
7.5
50%
32W–32L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova