← Search

Lee Meyers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BELLEAIR, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 35W–6L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history41 matches
L
Glenn Hughes / Jim Clark
2024-11-07 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew DePasquale championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-06 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew DePasquale championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-12 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew DePasquale
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-02-20 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Simmons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-02-13 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Simmons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-01-30 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Simmons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-01-30 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Simmons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-01-23 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Simmons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-03-28 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Rauch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-03-14 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Rauch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-03-07 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Rauch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
W
2023-02-21 · Pinellas/Pollick/65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Will Roeper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
85.4%
35W–6L · 66.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams