← Search

Herb Segal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Petersburg, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
5 matches · 2W–3L · seasons 2024–2024
Match history5 matches
L
2024-04-02 · SPTC Rogo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark van Denend
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-12 · SPTC Rogo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark van Denend
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
W
2024-03-05 · SPTC Rogo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark van Denend
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2024-02-20 · SPTC Rogo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Wagoner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-25 · SPTC Rogo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark van Denend
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams