← Search

Ginny Barnes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Satellite Beach, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 6W–4L · seasons 2024–2025
Match history10 matches
W
2025-02-14 · Fee - Luer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia de Simone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-01-31 · Fee - Luer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia de Simone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-01-10 · Fee - Luer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katharyn Luer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-03-01 · Fee - Luer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katharyn Luer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-16 · Fee - Luer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Blevins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-09 · Fee - Luer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katharyn Luer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
W
2024-02-03 · Fee - Luer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharon Underill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-02-02 · Fee - Luer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katharyn Luer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-01-26 · Fee - Luer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Blevins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2024-01-05 · Fee - Luer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katharyn Luer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams