← Search

Barbara Newman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
371 matches · 192W–179L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history371 matches
L
2026-10-11 · RCW - Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Seabra
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · Hempfield - Covell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Lawrence
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelli Velez
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Frey
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · Hempfield - Covell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Tully
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Woodard
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Kurtz
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Clark
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tiffany Marino
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Mann
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Mann
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tiffany Marino
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50.5%
53W–52L · 50.4% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.8% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.7% of games
8.0
63.6%
49W–28L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
55.4%
41W–33L · 50.9% of games
8.0mixed
35.6%
26W–47L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
191 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
74 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova