← Search

Kathy Hogan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Antonio, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 36W–72L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history108 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Tennis Park OG’s · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Huong Edmondson
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-13 · Tennis Park OG’s · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Hauck
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-29 · Tennis Park OG’s · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Hauck
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-11 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Cooper
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-21 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melanie Hanssen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-03-25 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Owens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-04 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Robinson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-14 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Huong Edmondson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-11-19 · Golden Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Owens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-24 · Rally Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Traugott
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-10-22 · Golden Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Kosta
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-10-08 · Golden Racquettes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Myrtha Horton
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
36.4%
32W–56L · 44.4% of games
6.0
20%
4W–16L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Singles
19%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams