← Search

James Appel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Churchton, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 87W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history157 matches
L
2026-10-07 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott A Green
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-18 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olugbenga Okubadejo
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-08 · Mixed Metaphors · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Draper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Appel · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-28 · Appel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Mitchell
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Mixed Metaphors · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laabs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · Feldtmose/Appel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Lay
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-07-25 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael McNees
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-19 · Mixed Metaphors · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Catalano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Feldtmose/Appel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Rothstein
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael McNees
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level17 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–7L · 28.8% of games
3.5
65%
13W–7L · 55.6% of games
4.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 49.2% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 29.5% of games
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.6% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.7% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 53.2% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.5% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.5% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.5% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 65.5% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.5% of games
8.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 42.7% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova