← Search

Jennifer DeWalls

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomfield Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 112W–112L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history224 matches
W
2026-11-01 · EAST-Zampardo 7.0 X 55&O F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Zampardo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-25 · LT-Dejaeger 3.0W Fall Singles F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-10-18 · EAST-Zampardo 7.0 X 55&O F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Doda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-11 · EAST-Zampardo 7.0 X 55&O F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Haines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · LT-Dejaeger 3.0W Fall Singles F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blaine Borchardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · LT- Dejaeger 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yuga An
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · LT- Marvel-Nelson 40s 3.5 (outside) NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Schmidt
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · LT- Marvel-Nelson 40s 3.5 (outside) NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Costabile
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · LT- Marvel-Nelson 18s 3.0 NW F1 · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · LT- Dejaeger 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chong Barkiewicz
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · LT- Marvel-Nelson 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Costabile
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 53.8% of games
3.5
42%
29W–40L · 49.2% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.7% of games
7.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.7% of games
7.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.8%
37W–27L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
56 matches
#2 Singles
11%
24 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer