← Search

Zachary Gray

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MACOMB, MI
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 2W–10L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history12 matches
L
2026-07-31 · PEACH-Mazur 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Eckert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-24 · PEACH-Mazur 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Eckert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · PEACH-White 18s 3.5M F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Avadhoot Paranjpe
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-01 · PEACH-White 18s 3.5M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Fitch
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · PEACH-Mazur 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Studzinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · PEACH-White 18s 3.5M F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hang
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · PEACH-Mazur 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Eckert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · PEACH-White 18s 3.5M F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-08-19 · 5PEACH-MAZUR 70MIX 18&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Mazur mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-27 · 5PEACH-MAZUR 70MIX 18&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gigi Oleson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-21 · 6PEACH-GAINES 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Studzinski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-31 · 6PEACH-GAINES 18&O MIX 7.0 SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Whitney Askew mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer