← Search

Neill Burris

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 36W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Neill Burris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-09-10 · JMorse (JCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kevin Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · MHolland (JCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Perry Pao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-27 · JMorse (JCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · MHolland (JCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · JMorse (JCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · JMorse/Haviland (JCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Hobby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-27 · JMorse/Haviland (JCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · JMorse/RTownsend (JCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Stokkebye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-21 · JMorse/RTownsend (JCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with RONALD TOWNSEND
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · PMayo (JCC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with RONALD TOWNSEND
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · JMorse/RTownsend (JCC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-13 · PMayo (JCC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with RONALD TOWNSEND
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
38%
27W–44L · 46.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 34.2% of games
6.5
32.1%
9W–19L · 45.5% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#1 Male Doubles
5%
5 matches
#1 Male Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams