← Search

Fred Chittenden

Snohomish, WA
0.0 year-end
41 matches · 10W–31L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Fred sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Fred is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Fred has been 3.5 for all 2 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Fred has gone from the 4th to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 41.9% of games
7.0
19.2%
5W–21L · 39.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
Stevan Phillips / David Rugen
2021-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with PETER VANDERLINDEN
−0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2021-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sadiq Karmali
−0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Raymond Hsia / Mark Jones
2021-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Galen Wickstrom
−0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
John Iwanski / Jack Goldberg
2021-10-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Galen Wickstrom
−0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-09-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Galen Wickstrom
+0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2021-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anthony Wilsdon
−0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Paul Bialaszewski / Gary Garside
2021-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Gilkey
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2021-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henry Todd
−0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Michael Duby / Martin Chang
2021-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Galen Wickstrom
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Tony Auriemma / Jeff Wolfenstine
2021-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Gilkey
+0.021better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Jim McGinley / Terry Coe
2021-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Pilawski
+0.041better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2021-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ray Hisayasu
−0.025below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.