← Search

Karen Ingrando

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sarasota, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 33W–32L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history65 matches
W
N/A
2026-05-21 · Mission Valley Shot Makers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marianne Zentz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-30 · Mission Valley Shot Makers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda Wiggins
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-02 · Mission Valley Shot Makers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marianne Zentz
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-01 · Royal Payne · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Hackney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-05-16 · Royal Payne · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Hackney
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-18 · Royal Payne · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Oskin
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-11 · Royal Payne · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Svetlana Abrams
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-28 · Mission Valley Gibbs · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Moriarty
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-13 · Payne Park Sets in the City · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy McCollum
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2024-02-28 · Payne Park Sets in the City · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonita Fyala
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-02-21 · Payne Park Sets in the City · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Shields
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-01-31 · Payne Park Sets in the City · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jo Anne Cullen
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 44.7% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 45.8% of games
7.0
61.8%
21W–13L · 54% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer