← Search

Debra Washmon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tyler, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 37W–89L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history126 matches
L
2026-04-15 · Peterson - Faulkner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanne Middleton
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-08 · Peterson - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Lowrance
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-21 · Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Middleton
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-20 · Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Middleton
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-10-04 · Peterson - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Lamb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-13 · Peterson - Faulkner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-16 · Peterson - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-03-02 · Peterson - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Terry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-10-12 · Peterson - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Middleton
loading the estimate
2-5
L
2024-10-02 · Peterson - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with June Clary
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-09-28 · Middleton - 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Isbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-18 · Peterson - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dorothy Peterson
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 49.6% of games
3.5
9.7%
3W–28L · 33.3% of games
6.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 44.1% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
7.1%
1W–13L · 28.1% of games
6.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe