← Search

Eleanor Kipp

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 51W–45L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history96 matches
W
2026-10-05 · GCC-Pons/Smith (18s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sabrina Lentz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Default
2026-09-24 · GCC-Pons/Smith (18s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessie Massey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-20 · GCC-Pons/Smith (18s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Kuhn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · GCC-Pons/Carlson (40s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sabrina Lentz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · GCC-Pons/Carlson (40s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with MI HWA LEE
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · GCC-Pons/Carlson (40s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sabrina Lentz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · GCC-Pons/Smith (18s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sabrina Lentz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · GCC-Pons/Carlson (40s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kerry Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · GCC-Pons/Carlson (4.0 40s W) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Kuhn
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-27 · GCC-Pons/Smith (4.0 18s W) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-01 · GCC-Pons/Smith (4.0 18s W) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassidy Johnson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · GCC-Pons/Smith (4.0 18s W) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roberta Veluci-Marlow
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.3% of games
4.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 63.3% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 52.4% of games
7.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 54.4% of games
8.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.5% of games
4.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.7% of games
8.5mixed
0%
0W–7L · 40.9% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams