← Search

Justine Barnes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pikeville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 103W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history162 matches
W
Default
2026-10-18 · GR-Smith (40s 8.5W) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-20 · GR-Haislip (18s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Musgrave
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-15 · GR-Taylor (40s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-01 · GR-Taylor (40s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · GR-Smith (40s 8.5W) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carol Taylor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-11 · GR-Taylor (40s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karla Jennings
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · GR-Haislip (18s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Musgrave
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · GR-Haislip (18s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Becky Hare
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · GR-Haislip (18s 4.0W SP) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Taylor Haislip championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · GR-Haislip (18s 4.0W SP) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Taylor Haislip championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · GR-Haislip (18s 4.0W SP) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Davis championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-11 · GR-Haislip (18s 4.0W SP) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Taylor Haislip championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 49.2% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.5%
31W–9L · 62.2% of games
4.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 56.1% of games
6.5
50%
11W–11L · 54.6% of games
7.5
63%
17W–10L · 54.5% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal