← Search

Mark Duncan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHARLESTON, SC
— year-end
50 matches · 31W–19L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history50 matches
L
2024-03-09 · Burkwood-Butterworth Thing #1 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ashley Hart mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-18 · Burkwood-Butterworth Thing #1 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ashley Hart mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-14 · Burkwood-Butterworth Thing #1 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heather Griggs mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-08-07 · 2 CCV Beale · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Blair
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-07-19 · 2 CCV Beale · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bradley Frohman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-07-05 · 2 CCV Beale · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bradley Frohman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-06-28 · 2 CCV Beale · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Fauntleroy
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-06-26 · 2 CCV Beale · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with William Carli
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2022-03-12 · WW-Gentry · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heather Griggs mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-5
L
2022-02-28 · WW-Gentry · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Courtney Greiner mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-02-05 · WW-Gentry · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heather Griggs mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2022-01-30 · WW-Gentry · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Courtney Greiner mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams12 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 61.2% of games
9.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.2% of games
8.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.8% of games
9.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer