← Search

Debbie Messmer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
427 matches · 252W–175L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history427 matches
L
2026-11-01 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chuck Snow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-31 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Calbreath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-29 · MAC Pettit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dylan Brod mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Calbreath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-10-24 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Adam Hamilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-17 · MAC - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Neuwelt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-11 · MAC - Hammers - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Roger Wisor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Adam Hamilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-21 · MAC Pettit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dylan Brod mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-12 · MAC Rhodus 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Delaney Rhodus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-09 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine McDowell
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine McDowell
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
4.0
58.1%
118W–85L · 53.8% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 51.9% of games
7.5
73.5%
25W–9L · 57.6% of games
8.5
40%
6W–9L · 45.6% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.8% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 71% of games
7.0mixed
68.9%
31W–14L · 57.4% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
60.7%
34W–22L · 50.9% of games
8.5mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
10W–20L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
184 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
136 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
100 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova