← Search

Kathleen Crotty

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manakin Sabot, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 129W–80L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history209 matches
W
2026-11-03 · HCC Stinson/Orski 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Stinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-11-01 · Hermitage Thompson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Blankley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-4
W
2026-10-25 · Hermitage Thompson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Forstner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-22 · Herm Yablonski/Lines · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Politowicz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · Hermitage Blankley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Blankley mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-09-25 · Hermitage Blankley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Blankley mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-25 · Hermitage Blankley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Blankley mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-21 · Herm Yablonski/Lines · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tommy Bader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-15 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobbie Lou Oley
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-01 · Herm Orski-Lines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Charles
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · Herm Orski-Lines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Carter
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Holmes
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level17 levels played
3.0
100%
9W–0L · 70.8% of games
3.5
75.8%
25W–8L · 63.7% of games
4.0
68.8%
44W–20L · 58.1% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 78.3% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 30% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.7% of games
5.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.4% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.9%
15W–17L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 47.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
40 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert