← Search

Tim Bixler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manhattan Beach, CA
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
34 matches · 16W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history34 matches
L
2026-10-04 · BC-MCC/KariCarpino7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mari Bellas mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-13 · BC-MCC/KariCarpino7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Vendetti mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-14 · BC-MCC/JanetWisialowski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Mann mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-25 · BC-MCC/JanetWisialowski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Mann mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-05-10 · BC-MCC/JeffGoldman · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Faye Cavanaugh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-01-26 · BC-MCC/JeffGoldman · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Pamela Lopez mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2021-06-26 · BC-MCC/JanetWisialowski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Leserman
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-06-05 · BC-MCC/JanetWisialowski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Graham
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2020-01-11 · BC-MCC/MikeYogi · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aubrey Sedberry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2020-01-04 · BC-MCC/JanetWisialowski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen McGee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2019-11-17 · BC-LLWS-MCC/MikeYogi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Yogi
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2019-10-26 · BC-LLWS-MCC/MikeYogi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ken Bush
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.9% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.1% of games
2.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King