← Search

Darla Flanagan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
32 matches · 15W–17L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history32 matches
L
2026-10-04 · GOLDEN GATEWY CW7.5B · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Philpot
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Baty
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-01-26 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Cooley & Wright · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hayes
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-03-15 · SILVERADO CC 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynette Hunt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-06-15 · CHABOT CANYON 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Sennott
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2023-06-03 · CHABOT CANYON 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-20 · CHABOT CANYON 18AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-05-14 · CHABOT CANYON 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2023-04-22 · CHABOT CANYON 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penny Anderson
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-03-27 · CRANE PK 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrice Bennett
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
Jackie Gage / Karen Waite
2023-03-23 · CRANE PK 65AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Setsuko Guillen
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-02-11 · CHABOT CANYON 40AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Astorian
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.5% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
10 matches
#2 Singles
28%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams