← Search

Michele Astorian

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 8W–35L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-09-06 · CRANE PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samanda Dorger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-14 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Amadia
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Shifflett
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-31 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Schmerl
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-13 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samanda Dorger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-07 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Lauren
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-31 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda DeBord
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-05-20 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celia Welch
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-18 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noreen Montgomery
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Gordon
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-04-13 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Wakerlin
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-04-12 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Kincaid
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 36.9% of games
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 33% of games
7.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 33.9% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches
Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams