← Search

Susan Shifflett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Helena, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 25W–39L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history64 matches
L
2026-10-10 · CRANE PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samanda Dorger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-06 · CRANE PK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsey Levine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Winters
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Calise
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-15 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicoletta Camerin
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Flanagan
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deidre Fine
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-14 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Baty
loading the estimate
2-1
L
2026-03-08 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Astorian
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-28 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Shafer
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Shafer
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
46.5%
20W–23L · 46.2% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.4% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#1 Singles
20%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer