← Search

Chamane Ifland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vacaville, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 141W–75L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history216 matches
W
2026-10-10 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Franz Lozano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-03 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kay Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-24 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claire Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Ciriaco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with JoAnn Clark championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with JoAnn Clark championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX8.0C · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Grafton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX8.0C · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clark Walmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7
W
2026-05-30 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Chen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Manelia
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Nickolette championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-21 · Smash Sisters/Fischer/Napa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Nickolette
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 68% of games
3.0
78.1%
25W–7L · 65.1% of games
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.6% of games
4.0
54.3%
25W–21L · 50.6% of games
5.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.2% of games
6.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 56.8% of games
7.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.2% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.7% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
57.5%
23W–17L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
53 matches
#1 Singles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King