← Search

Leanne Outlaw Rahn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fairfield, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 74W–95L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history169 matches
W
2026-10-24 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Zayas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-10-04 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Danilo A Belo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-22 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bernard Tormis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-09-09 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bernard Tormis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Johnson
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-09 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Onadiaz
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-04 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacey Word
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacey Word
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-01 · SOLANO TA/IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO CW6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fely Mariuzza
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-12 · SOLANO TA/IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle van de Pol
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-10 · SOLANO TA/IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Willis
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-05-24 · SOLANO TA/IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josephine Rosman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
65.5%
38W–20L · 58.3% of games
3.5
30.8%
12W–27L · 44.5% of games
5.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.9% of games
6.5
31%
9W–20L · 43% of games
7.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.1% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe