← Search

Michelle van de Pol

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 40W–66L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history106 matches
W
2026-09-24 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda DeBord
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-09-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-27 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda DeBord
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
Kateryna Borys
2026-07-05 · Singles · with Michelle Van De Pol tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
Michelle Van De Pol
2026-07-04 · Singles · with Eyerusalem Gettiye tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
Michelle Van De Pol
2026-07-04 · Singles · with Maggie Celestini tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-5
L
Michelle Van De Pol
2026-07-03 · Singles · with Ayse Hortacsu tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0B · #1 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Alex championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0B · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicoletta Camerin
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.1%
28W–21L · 52.9% of games
3.5
28%
7W–18L · 40.3% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
6.5
30%
3W–7L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
20 matches
Singles
15%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
10%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova