← Search

Judith Alex

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Francisco, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 86W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history163 matches
W
2026-10-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsay DeRose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-04 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Mccaffrey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-06 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Fifield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle van de Pol championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Locke
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mady Dufficy
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Herrera
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-16 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Bell
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacynthe Hamel
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Koo
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-18 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mady Dufficy
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-02 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shan Bai
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64.7%
22W–12L · 61.1% of games
3.5
37.5%
15W–25L · 46% of games
6.0
100%
9W–0L · 66.7% of games
6.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 48.7% of games
7.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 45.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 62.4% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
35 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe