← Search

Julie Fifield

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 23W–46L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history69 matches
L
2026-10-17 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandra Hoke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Gordon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-26 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandra Hoke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacynthe Hamel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-06 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judith Alex
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0B · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mari Morris
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0B · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colette Gell
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-20 · Vintage Volleyers/DeBord/Napa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Wippern
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-20 · Vintage Volleyers/DeBord/Napa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Wippern
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-15 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colette Gell
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-06-09 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colette Gell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-06-01 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colette Gell
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49% of games
3.0
31.4%
11W–24L · 41.9% of games
5.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 42.5% of games
6.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 43.8% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#1 Singles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
12%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer