← Search

Kristi Sanders

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 51W–24L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history75 matches
W
2026-11-01 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW5.5A · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anne Dickey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-25 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brie Cadman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-26 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW5.5A · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anne Dickey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mady Dufficy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-05 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Levine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW5.5A · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Manasse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · VINTAGE HS 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aaron Starfire mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · VINTAGE HS 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Fraggi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · VINTAGE HS 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Fraggi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle van de Pol
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samanda Dorger
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Aldrich
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.3%
19W–12L · 53.4% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 67.5% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.5% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer