← Search

Celia Welch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Helena, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 99W–57L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history156 matches
W
2026-10-31 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabriella Moutzouris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-10-17 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacynthe Hamel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandra Hoke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Samanda Dorger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Winters championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Valerie Mitchell-Johnson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Winters championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-20 · NAPA VALLEY TC/SILVERADO CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Winters championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-20 · NAPA VALLEY TC/SILVERADO CC 65AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Winters championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/SILVERADO CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Winters championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Winters
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-09 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda DeBord
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
69.2%
36W–16L · 56.7% of games
3.5
25%
4W–12L · 43.5% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.2% of games
6.0
71.7%
33W–13L · 59.7% of games
6.5
68%
17W–8L · 59.6% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal