← Search

Pamela Hicks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Murfreesboro, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 88W–104L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history192 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Frame/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Collier Andress Smith
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-14 · Frame/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Sweeney
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-09 · Hicks/Sweeney/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaLance
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-02 · Hicks/Sweeney/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Kinard
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · Frame/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie LaLance
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-21 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Kelley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-17 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cassie Bourdon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-14 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Kelley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Eubank
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cassie Bourdon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Kelley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Blankenship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
65.2%
30W–16L · 57.9% of games
4.0
29.4%
30W–72L · 41.3% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
61.9%
26W–16L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
56 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
13 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova