← Search

Herma Ahlers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BELLE MEAD, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 39W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history59 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Party's At the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alejandra Quiros
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-09-19 · Party's At the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Ann Taffner
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · Party's At the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Casey
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-27 · Pancha · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kei Imanishi championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Pancha · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kei Imanishi championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · Pancha · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Amanda Kaufman
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · Eastern/DeBarbadillo/5.0Tri-Level Women · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kei Imanishi
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-10 · Eastern/DeBarbadillo/5.0Tri-Level Women · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kei Imanishi
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Laura Travis / Alison Harrison
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Serena-G Xu championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Serena-G Xu championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kei Imanishi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Serena-G Xu
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
63.3%
19W–11L · 55.1% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.8% of games
9.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 53.5% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer