← Search

Cynthia van Maanen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Traverse City, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 24W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history39 matches
W
2026-06-28 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eve Elden
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eve Elden
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-07-13 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eve Elden
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-07-12 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eve Elden
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-04-06 · Team Kaufman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Elden
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-04-05 · Team Kaufman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Elden
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-03-16 · Team Kaufman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy MacKay
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2025-03-15 · Team Kaufman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Elden
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-01-12 · Team Fitzgerald · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Scholl
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-01-11 · Team Fitzgerald · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Thomas
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-08-25 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eve Elden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-08-25 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eve Elden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 56.1% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 42.4% of games
7.0
100%
13W–0L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe