← Search

Deborah Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Harbor Spgs, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 34W–31L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history65 matches
L
2026-05-17 · Team Brown · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Boisvert
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · Team Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Lyons
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · Laugh Lines · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hedy Kurland
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · Laugh Lines · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Stedman
loading the estimate
6-0, 5-6
L
2025-07-12 · Team Lowe · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucia Elden
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-12 · Team Lowe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Wadel
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-22 · team vermetten · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Queta Siefker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-21 · team vermetten · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Queta Siefker
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-12 · Team Fitzgerald · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Tollas
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-11 · Team Fitzgerald · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dianne Litzenburger
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-08-25 · Team Scholl · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dianne Litzenburger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-24 · Team Scholl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tammy Labell-Peer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 53.9% of games
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.1% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
10 matches
Singles
12%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe