← Search

Julie Winrich

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Green Valley, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 12W–20L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history32 matches
W
Default
2026-04-16 · Late Bloomers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judy Hudson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-24 · Late Bloomers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hadley
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-5
L
2026-03-05 · Late Bloomers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Holzwarth
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-02 · Court Chaos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mimi Bommersbach
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · Late Bloomers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Collias
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-09 · Court Chaos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mimi Bommersbach
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McKeown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McKeown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-03-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McKeown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Philpott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacqueline Czeiska
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2023-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Hudson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.3% of games
7.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 59% of the time
#3 Doubles
59%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova