← Search

Barbara Tracy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 6W–26L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history32 matches
L
2026-03-09 · JCC Swingers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Yaffe
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-26 · JCC- 70's · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Marshburn
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-02 · JCC Swingers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Polly Whitehorn
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-15 · JCC Rackets · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbie Hartter
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-12-15 · JCC Rackets · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Calvert
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-10 · JCC Rackets · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca LaMear
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Nelsen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Hays
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia Kelp-Lenane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbie Hartter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Jan Westemeier / Susan Pharr
2024-03-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monique Bredas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbie Hartter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
19.4%
6W–25L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams