← Search

Mary McKeown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Green Valley, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 51W–36L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history87 matches
W
Default
2026-03-25 · Lunch Ladies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Brockley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-25 · Lunch Ladies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Brockley
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-18 · Lunch Ladies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacy Lagan
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-01-28 · Lunch Ladies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Brockley
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-22 · Green Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Jane Bartley
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-15 · Green Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Brockley
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-08 · Green Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Brockley
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-12-01 · Green Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Brockley
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-24 · Green Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Jane Bartley
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-10 · Green Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Brockley
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Winrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Winrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 45% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.4% of games
8.0
65.2%
45W–24L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal