Queta Siefker
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Howell, MI
30 matches · 13W–17L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history30 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2025
4DTS-inside-COLLINS 70DW TH 55&O SEM F1
4NAC-HAD 35 DW TU 40&O SEM F2
team vermetten
2DET-inside-COLLINS AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F2
NMIA65&O 7.0W Vermetten
1NAC-SHELAR AD55&O 70DW TH SEM F2
2023 NMI A 65& Over 7.0W Vermetten
3NAC-CHODKOWSKI 70NW 55&O AD TUES SEM F2
NMI/Vermetten/A65&O 7.0W
1SCNO-CHODKOWSKI 70NW 55&O AD TUES SEM F1
1SCNO-VITAL 70dw 55 thur sem F1
2020 35 CREDIT Women GROUP 1 - COVID Registrations
4LIVY-VELLUCCI 70DW 55 THUR SEM F3
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
7 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.