← Search

Maggi Steele

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Traverse City, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 37W–12L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history49 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-02 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smock
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smock
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-10-18 · Team Steele/LaFave · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melanie LaFave
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-10-18 · Team Steele/LaFave · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melanie LaFave
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-13 · Team Steele · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Fairbanks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-07-12 · Team Steele · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Fairbanks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-06-22 · Team Richter/Bretz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Blewett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-06-21 · Team Richter/Bretz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Blewett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-08-25 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Fairbanks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
W
2024-08-24 · Team Steele · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Fairbanks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-08-18 · Team Richter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smock
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.8% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
79.4%
27W–7L · 64.1% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova