← Search

Tammy Labell-Peer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Harbor Springs, MI
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 28W–13L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history41 matches
L
2024-08-24 · Team Scholl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-05-20 · Team Fitzgerald · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-05-07 · Team Fitzgerald · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-07 · Team Fitzgerald · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Tollas
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-06 · Team Fitzgerald · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Jacoby
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-05-06 · Team Fitzgerald · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-06-01 · 3PEACH-PARROTT 35NW 40&O AD WED SEM F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheryl Eckert
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-05-25 · 3PEACH-PARROTT 35NW 40&O AD WED SEM F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Kim Lamb
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-05-18 · 3PEACH-PARROTT 35NW 40&O AD WED SEM F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Maglicic
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-03-25 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 mix 40&O SEM f2 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Peer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-03-11 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 mix 40&O SEM f2 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Peer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-02-13 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 mix 40&O SEM f2 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Peer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
75.9%
22W–7L · 58.9% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#1 Singles
17%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova