← Search

Heidi Maglicic

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SAINT CLAIR SHORES, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
198 matches · 78W–120L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history198 matches
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Froggett mixed championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregory Patterson mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Ball mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-07 · 3EAST-Mitchell 6.0 X 55&0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dennis Gannan mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-30 · 3EAST-Mitchell 6.0 X 55&0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marty Tighe mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-16 · 3EAST-Mitchell 6.0 X 55&0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Froggett mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-10-05 · 2PEACH- Parrott 65 WOMEN COMBO F6 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Mazur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-08-19 · 5PEACH-MAZUR 70MIX 18&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Nellis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-08-12 · 3PEACH-ERFURT 70NW TU 55&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Lamers
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2025-08-06 · 3PEACH-ERFURT 70NW TU 55&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Gaines
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-23 · 3PEACH-MAZUR 35NW WE 18&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gigi Oleson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-21 · 3PEACH-MAZUR 35NW WE 18&O SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Negri
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 55.2% of games
3.5
38.2%
26W–42L · 47.1% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 57.1% of games
6.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 51.6% of games
7.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 40.6% of games
7.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 33% of games
6.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
19.2%
5W–21L · 38.7% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 31.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
10 matches
#3 Singles
4%
8 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King