← Search

Cheryl Cusmano

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Grosse Pointe Shores, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 18W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history44 matches
W
2026-07-12 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Rzepka
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taryn Loughlin
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rose Wedemeyer
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · 2EAST-ZAMPARDO 35NW WE 18&O SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Stablein
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-21 · 2EAST-ZAMPARDO 35NW WE 18&O SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Stablein
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-07-20 · 2EAST-ZAMPARDO 35NW WE 18&O SEM F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Goldsbrough
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adarsh Varma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-08-08 · 4EAST-ZAMPARDO MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Stevic mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-06-09 · 4EAST-ZAMPARDO MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Stevic mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-06-20 · 4EAST-ZAMPARDO 35NW 18&O AD MON SEM F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with AnnMarie Sanford
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-06-15 · 2CRT4-WILLIAMS 40DW 40&O AD WED SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Vyletel
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-06 · 4EAST-ZAMPARDO 35NW 18&O AD MON SEM F5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with AnnMarie Sanford
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 46.4% of games
4.0
7.1%
1W–13L · 31.5% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 63.9% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova